|
Segmental
retaining walls create and conserve building space.
By
Janis Keating
Besides
shoring up existing land, retaining walls also can allow
for the expansion of buildable area on a site. Throughout
the nation, many sites previously thought unusable have
been developed as builders use retaining walls to soften
steep slopes with terracing or create a flat, stable
parcel of land in hilly areas.
Creating
Space
When the
Poway Unified School District, located in a suburb of
San Diego, CA, needed to construct Westview High School,
two small, wooded canyons were the only space available
for such a project. The problem: how to turn undeveloped
and seemingly unusable land into a large school campus.
Grading
contractor Sierra Pacific West Inc. began by removing
trees, cutting away, filling, and grading the two canyons
until only a buildable site existed. The most extensive
soil cuts were approximately 60 to 70 feet deep; the
fill area was 40 to 50 feet high. A geogrid-reinforced
retaining wall was built on the site using a combination
of blocks from Keystone Retaining Wall Systems to deal
with substantial grade and soil-retention issues. RCP
Block & Brick of San Diego, which has been producing
Keystone products since 1992, supplied the almost 20,000
square feet of Keystone's Standard, Compac, and Planter
units used in the retaining wall. Before a single block
was placed in the project, however, excavation challenges
at the site had to be met.
Sierra
Pacific West Vice President Chad Sheridan recalls the
situation: "Why build a high school there? The site
had been chosen, and had been under development, for
almost 10 years. At one time even the Army Corps of
Engineers had been involved. There was a canyon on each
side of the site, with hills that reached about 70 feet.
We first cleared all trees, including a eucalyptus grove.
We needed to level the hills into the canyon to make
a flat area for construction."
Leveling
the land didn't always go smoothly, however. "We discovered
concretionssilty-sand soil compressed until it
was the consistency of concrete," Sheridan says. "The
excavators couldn't break those concretionsnot
even the large D-9 dozers. We hit 1 to 3 inches of cobbled
'cement'; some chunks were as large as pickup trucks!
However, even if we'd known about the concretions before
we made our job estimate, it still wasn't something
we couldn't deal with. In effect, it allowed us to create
onsite backfill. We crushed the concretions in a 10,000-pound
breaking machine, which was a little more costly than
the cost of offsite fill, but then we didn't have the
expense of trucking fill for those voids. In one way,
it was nice, because we could break the concretions
to the precise size we wantedpieces that could
be handled by a 980 loader for placement into a crusher.
We stockpiled the material there, and Geogrid Retaining
Wall Systems actually backfilled the walls."
After
the appropriate excavation was complete, the school
site was 30 feet above the area designated as the athletic
field. "Because every acre of buildable land was needed
to complete the campus, it was impossible to consider
a slope for this site," says Mike Stevenson of Geogrid
Retaining Wall Systems Inc. "A 2-to-1 slope with a 30-foot
rise in elevation would mean the loss of 60 feet back
and across the line where elevation began. Every inch
of that valuable space was needed to build the athletic
field." The solution: a near-vertical segmental retaining
wall.
As
the wall was installed, other challenges called for
creative measures, such as the deep footings required
for the large light posts. Sonotubes were used to build
the footings in the fill area, and soil was compacted
around the tubes as the crew added fill. A 6-foot masonry
fence parapet was to be built on top of the segmental
retaining wall; construction design had to be coordinated
so the fence's footing was atop the topmost retaining
wall block and cantilevered back into the fill. The
installation crew had to ensure that the geogrid was
low enough to accommodate the footings.
The
wall also features a distinctive blue "W" design, which
was built using contrasting blue Keystone units. "The
'W' in the wall was a last-minute thing," Stevenson
concludes. "The idea came up late into the design. They
asked me for my opinion on how it could be accomplished,
so I took a set of plans and colored in the appropriate
blocks." RCP Block & Brick tinted a number of Keystone
blocks for the purpose.
Saving
Valuable Land
While retaining
walls can help create more land, they also protect nearby
lands. When the Maryland Transportation Authority reconstructed
the Interstate 95/JFK Memorial Highway interchange at
state Route 22 in Harford County near Aberdeen, it needed
not only to improve traffic flow but also to protect
natural water flows in the area.
The $23 million
project included the construction of diamond loop ramps,
collector-distributor roads, and bridge replacements
and dualization of Maryland Route 22. Traffic at the
interchange is expected to skyrocket in coming years,
as it's adjacent to the new Cal Ripken Stadium, home
of the Aberdeen Ironbirds a Baltimore Orioles farm team
of baseball's Class-A New YorkñPenn League. The stadium
complex, completed in 2002, is the first phase of a
multimillion-dollar "Aberdeen Project" planned to encompass
112 acres of land development off I-95.
Jeff
Basford, a geotechnical engineer with Whitman, Requardt
and Associates LLP, the project design consultant, explains
some of the project's challenges: "The overpass over
I-95 was the main portion of the project. It was old,
and it needed to be wider. In addition, since I-95 was
being widened, the overpass bridge also needed to be
longer.
"The
site originally contained a 2:1 slope," he notes. "The
design was constrained by wetlands. That's why a wall
was built, as opposed to a slope." The maximum height
of the wall was 23 feet; it has a vertical face with
2H:1V toe slope at the bottom of the wall.
As the water
table was a foot or so below the bottom of the wall,
springs were popping up and water was seeping through
the back of the wall. Some underdrains also outletted
in the slope. Wall widths are typically 0.7 times their
height. However, because of the soft soil an organic,
high-plasticity clay and the adjacent wetlands, geogrid
straps were placed 30 feet behind the face of the wall."
Geogrids
and Mesa segmental concrete blocks, both from Tensar
Earth Technologies, were used in the construction. Together,
they create a positive, mechanical, end-bearing connection,
with a compressive strength that exceeds American Association
of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
standards of greater than 4,000 pounds per square inch.
To handle
the water, we used number-57 stone a free-draining,
approximately 0.75-inch crushed stone for drainage,"
Basford notes. The wall includes 24-inch-diameter drainage
pipe penetrations. "Also, the site presented problems
with slide and bearing capacity, so we ended up with
a small berm in front of the wall."
The project
began with the general contractor, Daisy Construction
Company of New Castle, DE, cutting out the area. "They
went about half way(15 feet of slope were removed,"
Basford says. Stone and grids were placed, but because
of the location of the access roads, dump trucks were
driving over the geogrid. "The owner decided to undercut
the second half of the wallthe north halfand
stabilize it. The wall had to be built in smaller sections,
so they could then put the wall in the way they wanted.
Perhaps the biggest challenge was the wall's bottom
3 feet until they made the decision to undercut it.
They weren't used to the soil they encountered, so the
grids kept getting messed up. After they got out of
the ground, the next challenge was laying out the grids
and having to stress how taut the geogrids had to be.
In filling the wall everyone had to make sure the wall
itself was meshed up to the existing ground."
Because
the interchange needed to be lit, light pole foundations
were anchored 15 feet deep within the reinforced zone.
"Corregated metal pipes were installed at the bottom,
and as they went up they placed the collar and put geogrid
around it. The pipes were used as forms for the light
pole caisson foundation," Basford explains. "The MESA
wall installer, Mumford & Miller of Odessa, Delaware,
liked the system's ease of installation, and the company
is now working on other Mesa wall installations."
Saving
Valuable Streets, Bridges
For 20 years,
an H-pile and wood lagging retaining wall had secured
the Lawndale Drainage Channel in Tupelo, MS, but time
had taken its toll. The wood had rotted and could at
any time allow a major washout and the wall was immediately
upstream from a bridge on Lawndale Drive, a major Tupelo
street.
The
channel, which is 20 feet wide by 10 feet deep, carries
a considerable amount of water during storms," says
James Glasgow of Con-Terra Construction of Fulton, MS,
the company that replaced the wall. "The channel doesn't
crest over its banks, but water lapped at an adjacent
residential property. The owner wanted something done."
Working
with Tupelo's Rutledge Construction, the managing contractor,
and engineers from Neel-Schaffer Inc., Con-Terra suggested
the best and fastest solution would be a segmental retaining
wall. "They're ideal for a drainage channel; they don't
have mortar to deteriorate. Of course, that's if you
can get them in before flooding," Glasgow says, noting
that, because the hurricane season was fast approaching,
time was of the essence. In February 2003, Rutledge
Construction removed the debris from the failed wall,
and Con-Terra began work on the replacement wall.
First,
the channel water was diverted by building a coffer
dam to direct flow to the other side of the channel,"
Glasgow explains. "We put down a foundation of crushed
stone compacted to 95%, then put in the first course
of block, which always takes the longest time. Although
the area has silty loam soil, which had to be replaced
by importing a lot of sand, the lower depths were filled
with hard chalk soil, so we proceeded with three courses
of geogrid." Con-Terra used the StoneWall Select system
from ICD Corporation of Milwaukee, WI, for the project.
"These walls are unusually strong, easy to build, and
among the most attractive on the market." Glasgow says.
 |
The wall
plans, designed by Little Rock, AR, engineer Scott Miller,
called for a segmental retaining wall 112 feet long
and 10 feet tall, with over 1,700 square feet of surface
area. Six geogrid layers were needed to stabilize the
bank and provide rigidity. "The geogrid has to be stretched
back 8 feet behind the wall, and anchored by putting
dirt over it," Glasgow notes. "You have to come up and
pin the geogrid at the block line with stakes. We placed
2 feet of block in between each geogridin total,
about 1,000 square yards of geogrid."
Designed
to look like natural stone, StoneWall Select offers
a patented clip-positioning system that snaps multiple
courses of blocks together. The blocks have hollow cores
that are filled with crushed rock, which adds strength
and positive connection between courses of blocks.
Con-Terra's
construction crew of six finished the project in seven
working days with the aid of some unusual equipment.
"We normally use an excavator and trench compactor,"
Glasgow says, "but in this case, we had to use a trackhoe
forklifta Skytrack forklift with extend-a-boomwith
a bucket, so we could reach across the channel." The
wall was completed in May 2003, before summer thunderstorms
and the impending hurricane season.
This no-maintenance
wall will last just about forever, and it looks nicemuch
more attractive than the previous wall," Glasgow concludes.
"It also ended up being a more cost-effective solution.
It was about 25% cheaper than a concrete wall, and up
to 50% less money than a treated-wood and H-pile wall."
Janis
Keating is a frequent contributor to Forester Communications
publications.
EC - September October 2004
|